Tracker
Open Records Tracker
Open public-information requests and records identified as needed to answer the questions tracked on this site.
This tracker covers two different things: open requests and records that have only been identified as needed. Request lifecycle describes where a request stands in its handling process. It is separate from evidence status, and receiving some records does not mean a request is complete.
Filed or sent public-information requests
4 Laguna Vista requests filed by Julie + 1 Port Isabel request sent by Julie. 5 requests listed. No source documents or download links are published in this tracker. The City Manager is the chief administrative officer and officer for public information, responsible for release. The City Secretary is the processing and delivery office.
Status last verified October 29, 2026
Displayed ages and timing counts are measured through October 29, 2026. Since the September 20, 2026 snapshot, no additional responsive records have been received for any open request listed below. No request is documented as complete. Earlier partial production remains described in the individual entries. ORR-2026-155 remains listed separately with timing not evaluated.
- ORR-2026-101 · Laguna VistaPARTIAL
Financial records and supporting documentation
- Request reference
- ORR-2026-101
- Filed date
- Filed June 24, 2026
- Requester
- Julie Clancy
- Agency
- Town of Laguna Vista
- Processing contact
- Julia Barrera, City Secretary
127 calendar days elapsed
Calendar days elapsed as of October 29, 2026
WRITTEN COMPLIANCE GAP
Statutory checkpoint: 10 business days
The Town's stated July 15 production target passed. The production remains incomplete, and no later specific date and hour for the remaining records is documented.
- Delay explanation
- The Town initially cited volume and later said Finance still owed documents. No current complete-availability date is documented.
- Documented complete-availability date
- None documented
Calendar days elapsed are shown for public tracking, not as overdue days. The statutory checkpoint is measured in business days.
- Known gap
- 6 requested record categories remain unresolved
- Production measure
- 16 files received
Administrative lifecycle
Partial production — follow-up openUnresolved items
- April 30 reporting, trial balance, and supporting schedules
- Bank and cash-to-ledger reconciliations
- Fund-balance classifications and rollforward
- Reserve calculation, funding source, transfers, and authorization
- Fund-balance, reserve, financial-management, and minimum-reserve policies
- Journal entries and interfund-transfer schedules
The exact percentage cannot be calculated because the production does not map each file to each requested category.
File counts are not completion percentages. Administrative milestones do not measure document completeness. Calendar days elapsed are measured through October 29, 2026.
Public summary
Sixteen files were received after payment. The Town later described the production as partial and said additional Finance records were still being gathered. A follow-up remains unresolved. No additional files have been received since the September 20 tracker review. The earlier 16-file production remains partial, and the six listed record categories remain unresolved.
Next step
Classify each outstanding category as produced, not maintained, outside scope, or withheld under a cited exception.
Current lifecycle: Partial production — follow-up open. Evidence status: PARTIALLY DOCUMENTED. These labels describe different things.
Read the original request record, production timeline, and connected Fund 100 questions → - ORR-2026-135 · Laguna VistaPARTIAL
Tourism/TIRZ project approval records
- Request reference
- ORR-2026-135
- Filed date
- Filed August 4, 2026
- Requester
- Julie Clancy
- Agency
- Town of Laguna Vista
- Processing contact
- Julia Barrera, City Secretary
86 calendar days elapsed
Calendar days elapsed as of October 29, 2026
COMPLIANCE NOT ESTABLISHED
Statutory checkpoint: 10 business days
A completion notice was issued and five PDFs were later received, but the remaining scope has not been classified and no agency-issued complete production manifest is verified.
- Delay explanation
- No documented explanation resolves the remaining scope or provides a date for complete production.
- Documented complete-availability date
- None documented
Calendar days elapsed are shown for public tracking, not as overdue days. The statutory checkpoint is measured in business days.
- Known gap
- At least 2 central issues remain unverified
- Production measure
- Five PDFs inventoried; no agency-issued complete production manifest verified.
Administrative lifecycle
Production received — completeness under reviewUnresolved items
- A complete final project and finance-plan record set
- The calculation or source support for the reported approximately $28 million
File count does not establish completeness. Completeness remains under review because the received records have not been fully reconciled to the request scope.
File counts are not completion percentages. Administrative milestones do not measure document completeness. Calendar days elapsed are measured through October 29, 2026.
Public summary
A later production contains five substantive PDFs after an initial delivery issue. The record set is under completeness review; the complete project-and-finance-plan materials and support for the reported approximately $28 million have not yet been verified. No additional files have been received since the September 20 tracker review. The five previously inventoried PDFs remain under completeness review; no complete production manifest has been verified.
Next step
Obtain a complete production manifest and the missing or incomplete plan materials.
Current lifecycle: Production received — completeness under review. Evidence status: PARTIALLY DOCUMENTED. These labels describe different things.
- ORR-2026-138 · Laguna VistaVERIFY
Supplemental financial records
- Request reference
- ORR-2026-138
- Filed date
- Working filed date: August 20, 2026 — being verified
- Requester
- Julie Clancy
- Agency
- Town of Laguna Vista
- Processing contact
- Julia Barrera, City Secretary
- Relationship
- Supplemental to ORR-2026-101
70 calendar days elapsed · working date unverified
Calendar days elapsed as of October 29, 2026
COMPLIANCE STATUS UNVERIFIED
Statutory checkpoint: Not applied
Timing is not evaluated: the August 20 working start date and primary filing/receipt records remain unverified. The request, confirmation, extension notice, and any production must be verified before applying the checkpoint.
- Delay explanation
- The delay record cannot be evaluated until the primary notices are added.
- Documented complete-availability date
- None documented
Calendar days elapsed are shown for public tracking, not as overdue days. The statutory checkpoint is measured in business days.
- Known gap
- 4 essential tracking items remain unverified
- Production measure
- No responsive production inventory verified
Administrative lifecycle
Filing and response timeline being verifiedUnresolved items
- Original request
- Filing confirmation
- Extension notice
- Any production or substantive response
Record completeness cannot be calculated until the filing and response source set is verified.
File counts are not completion percentages. Administrative milestones do not measure document completeness. Calendar days elapsed are measured through October 29, 2026.
Public summary
No responsive production has been verified. This supplemental request continues the Fund 100 source-record reconciliation. The original filing confirmation, extension notice, and the agency’s latest response or production record still need to be added to the source file.
Next step
Add the original request, receipt confirmation, and latest agency response before advancing the tracker.
Current lifecycle: Filing and response timeline being verified. Evidence status: VERIFY. These labels describe different things.
- Agency number pending · Long IslandAWAITING
City of Port Isabel — Long Island advertising and recruitment expenditures
- Request reference
- Agency number pending
- Sent date
- Sent September 15, 2026, by certified mail
- Requester
- Julie Clancy
- Agency
- City of Port Isabel
- Processing contact
- Susie S. Alcocer, City Secretary
- Scope
- Existing records of City spending for advertising, marketing, promotion, or economic-development recruitment related to Long Island from January 1, 2020 through the date received, including financial detail, vendors, contracts, invoices, approvals, funding source, payee, date, amount, and purpose.
44 calendar days elapsed since sent
Calendar days elapsed as of October 29, 2026
DELIVERY PENDING
Statutory checkpoint: Not applied
Sent by certified mail September 15, 2026. Delivery has not yet been documented, so no legal-response clock or deadline is shown.
- Delay explanation
- Not applicable until receipt is documented.
- Documented complete-availability date
- None documented
Calendar days elapsed are shown for public tracking, not as overdue days. The statutory checkpoint is measured in business days.
- Known gap
- Delivery, agency number, and the entire production remain pending
- Production measure
- No records received
Administrative lifecycle
Sent — delivery pendingUnresolved items
- Certified-mail delivery confirmation
- City-assigned request number
- Responsive production or substantive response
Sent September 15, 2026. Delivery has not yet been documented, so no response deadline is shown.
File counts are not completion percentages. Administrative milestones do not measure document completeness. Calendar days elapsed are measured through October 29, 2026.
Public summary
No responsive records have been received. Agency receipt, assigned request number, and certified-mail delivery confirmation remain unverified; no legal-response clock is shown until receipt is documented.
Next step
Add delivery confirmation and the City's assigned request number when received.
Current lifecycle: Sent — delivery pending. Evidence status: AWAITING RECORDS. These labels describe different things.
ORR-2026-155 · Laguna Vista
Two Fund 100 reports. One $153,668 question.
- Request
- ORR-2026-155
- Requester
- Julie
- Status
- SUBMITTED — REQUESTER-REPORTED; CONFIRMATION/DATE AWAITING VERIFICATION
- Filing date
- Awaiting verification from the dated Town confirmation/email
- Reconciliation
- Resolution status: UNRESOLVED
Timing status not evaluated yet. No filing age, overdue count, or legal-response clock is shown until the filing date is verified. This entry does not represent a new status review.
As of October 29, 2026, no confirmation or responsive records have been verified. Timing remains unevaluated until the dated Town confirmation or email is added.
The reporting difference is unresolved; it does not establish missing money or wrongdoing.
Read the source comparison and request scope →
Identified or still needed
Records identified as necessary. These categories are not counted as requests. Filing links are identified only where established; other needs have no verified filing.
Showing 11 of 11 records
- Laguna VistaNEEDED — FILING NOT VERIFIED
Current marina lease
- Likely holder or source
- Town
- What it could answer
- Who holds the lease, on what terms, and for how long.
- Laguna VistaNEEDED — FILING NOT VERIFIED
Lease-authorizing ordinance
- Likely holder or source
- Town
- What it could answer
- Whether a lease of Town land was authorized by ordinance, as Charter §2.10(h) requires.
- Laguna VistaNEEDED — FILING NOT VERIFIED
Marina deeds and recorded restrictions
- Likely holder or source
- County real property records
- What it could answer
- Ownership of the marina property and any recorded restrictions.
- Laguna VistaNEEDED — FILING NOT VERIFIED
CDC $63,350 source file
- Likely holder or source
- CDC
- What it could answer
- What the marina/ramp item represents and how it was classified.
- Laguna VistaNEEDED — FILING NOT VERIFIED
Ramp contracts and procurement file
- Likely holder or source
- Town
- What it could answer
- Scope, award process, and change orders for the ramp project.
- Laguna VistaNEEDED — FILING NOT VERIFIED
Invoices and payment records
- Likely holder or source
- Town
- What it could answer
- What was billed, by whom, and what was paid.
- Laguna VistaNEEDED — FILING NOT VERIFIED
LVRA financial records
- Likely holder or source
- LVRA
- What it could answer
- How the operating entity is funded and what it collects.
- Laguna VistaNEEDED — FILING NOT VERIFIED
Membership and access rules
- Likely holder or source
- LVRA
- What it could answer
- Who may use the marina, on what terms, and at what cost.
- Laguna VistaNEEDED — FILING NOT VERIFIED
Rent payments to the Town
- Likely holder or source
- Town
- What it could answer
- Whether rent is owed, billed, and received.
- Laguna VistaLINKED REQUEST — VERIFICATION PENDING
Source ledger export and any revision or reissue memo
Linked to ORR-2026-138 and ORR-2026-155; production not yet verified.
- Likely holder or source
- Town
- What it could answer
- Why two Fund 100 statements carrying the same date show different balances.
- Long IslandLINKED REQUEST — VERIFICATION PENDING
Long Island advertising and recruitment expenditures
Linked to the Port Isabel certified-mail request; agency receipt/reference remains unverified.
- Likely holder or source
- City of Port Isabel
- What it could answer
- Show how much public money was spent.
Records already held and published — with both an evidence status and an access status — are listed on the Records page.
Records & methodology